Logo Get Report Subscribe
Share About this page
Bookmetrix tracks social and scholarly activity around published books

Get your print report emailed

Enter your email and we can send you a printable report on this item. ( View sample )

Print report emailed

We'll send you a print report shortly at Unknown

Receive our monthly book update for this book

We will send you an email each month containing links to all the book updates you subscribe to. This will keep informed of all the activity around your favourite books.

Subscribed

You will now receive reports at unknown email address

Requested

All activity for Book:

Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century

Crossref Citations by year

Crossref Citations by Chapter

Online mention summary

Online mention summary
  • 8 tweets
See all mentions…

What is this?

The data shown here were aggregated by the data service Altmetric, which collects attention surrounding scholarly books and articles.

Mentions over time

Mendeley readership by country

This book has 104 Mendeley readers (combined total for all chapters).
Click here to see more details on the Mendeley website.

Country %
Canada 2 2%
Austria 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 91 88%

Mendeley readership by discipline

Discipline %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 46%
Environmental Science 31 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 6 6%

Mendeley readership by professional status

Professional status %
Student > Master 31 30%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 22 21%

SpringerLink Download summary

The combined chapter downloads for this book are 44,301.

Reviews

  • "This work can serve as a textbook for a capstone class for forestry majors and is also a useful reference for graduate students, active forest science researchers, and forest management practitioners. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through professionals/practitioners."

    J. Chen, Choice, Vol. 51 (11), August, 2014